Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 U.S. 460 - The State of Pennsylvania v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company

The State of Pennsylvania v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company’s Empirical Analysis

59 U.S. 460 · 1855

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably State of Texas v. State of Florida (1939), Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. (1924)

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

50185518601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Original jurisdiction in equity, in a particular class of. eases, conferred by the Constitution on this court, has been interpreted to impose the duty to adjudicate according to such rules and principles as governed the action of the Court of Chancery in England, which administered equity at the time of the emigration of our ancestors, and down to the period when our Constitution was formed. And when the Constitution of the United States conferred that jurisdiction on this court, it cannot be construed to exclude the power possessed and constantly exercised by every court of equity then known, to use its discretion to award or refuse costs, as its judgment of the right of the ease, in that particular, might require. The court entertains no"doubt of its power to award costs, and deny the application lo file a bill of review;.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.