Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 VACIR 154 - Robison v. McLeod & Co.

Robison v. McLeod & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc. · Commercial Business Systems, Inc. v. BellSouth Services, Inc. · Horton v. Horton · Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Melendez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “impugns the attorney’s professional integrity. It thus should be made only after the most sober consideration. Those who make such a request should, I suggest, satisfy themselves that they have a solid good-faith objectively reasonable belief that the opponent’s claim is groundless, unreasonable, or frivolous. ... No harm was done here, but I fear that the invocation of [sanctions] has slipped into the “routine” prayers for relief of too many good lawyers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.