Simmonds v. People’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1561
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Johnson v. United States · California v. Green · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Hurtado v. People of the State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[defendants] may be prosecuted by information unless a local law requires [they] be prosecuted by grand jury.” Simmonds v. People, 59 V.I. 480 , 490 (2013) (quoting Codrington v. People, 57 V.I. 176 , 196 (2012)). 3 . While”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.