¶1This is a divorce case. The statement of facts is comprised of between three and four hundred pages of testimony of the ultra salacious type, a specific review of which would serve no useful purpose. The case involves only questions of fact. An examination of the testimony convinces us that the decree of the trial court was equitable. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
59 Wash. 695
Seefeldt v. Seefeldt
Decided June 13, 1910
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1910-06-13
Totten, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered September 17, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for divorce.
Affirmed · Decided 1910-06-13