Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 Wash. App. 368 - State v. Tarica

59 Wash. App. 368 - State v. Tarica’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland (1995), 92 Wash. App. 307 - State v. Contreras (1998)

30 state decisions

130199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · Chapman v. State of California · Wong Sun v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s a normal rule, defense counsel brings such a motion anytime there may be a question as to the validity of a search and subsequent seizure. Because the motion is made pretrial and not in front of the jury, there does not appear to be any way to characterize the failure to bring the motion to suppress as a legitimate trial tactic. Therefore, [the defendant's] counsel's performance was deficient.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “manifest error affecting a constitutional right”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no question that the search and seizure issue presented is constitutional, and there is a reasonable possibility that a motion to suppress, had it been made, would have been successful. However, there was no error in the trial court proceedings below.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.