59 Wash. App. 412 - State v. Horton’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 87 Wash. 2d 922 - Johnson v. Morris · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 96 Wash. 2d 552 - Overton v. Economic Assistance Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a statute refers to another statute of this state, the reference includes any amendments to the referenced statute unless a contrary intent is clearly expressed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blilie · In Re Acron“[u]nder RCW 1.12.028, the reference in [the enhancement statute] to RCW 9A.36.020 would include RCW 9A.36.021 on its effective date without further legislative action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Acron“If the offender ... was armed with a deadly weapon ... the following times shall be added to the presumptive range[:].... (c) 12 months for Assault 2 (RCW 9A.36.020).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Acron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.