United States v. Corbin’s Empirical Analysis
590 F.2d 398 · 1979
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Cartagena (1989), United States v. Boylan (1990)
47 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Remmer v. United States · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A district court has broad, though not unlimited, discretion to determine the extent and nature of its inquiry into allegations of juror bias.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“undertake[n] an adequate inquiry into whether the alleged tainting incident occurred and whether it was prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The judge, with counsel present, questioned all jurors under oath. The offending juror vigorously denied having made the statement. Satisfied that the other jurors had not heard anyone make such a comment, the court found that the offending juror did not make the comment, but nevertheless took the step of excluding him from the jury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.