McNamara v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
590 F.3d 607 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Reed v. Barnhart · Vickle v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the Commissioner's decision is supported by ... substantial evidence on the record as a whole.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Astrue · Ash v. Colvin“a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work related limitation of function.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.