Jeffredo v. Macarro’s Empirical Analysis
590 F.3d 751 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 203 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Duncan v. Walker · Trop v. Dulles · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · Jones v. Cunningham · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) suspicion that a non-member has committed a violation of any applicable tribal, state or federal law within the Pechanga Reservation; (2) suspicion that a non-member is a danger to himself, herself or others; (3) a finding by a Tribal Ranger that a non-member is a public nuisance; or (4) any behavior which is suspicious or not consistent with a legitimate visit either to a tribal enterprise for business or patronage purposes, or to the home of a resident of the Pechanga Indian Reservation by invitation and in compliance with the Non-Member Reservation Access and Rental Ordinance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jeffredo v. Macarro“Membership is an enrolled member documented in the Band’s Official Enrollment Book of 1979. Qualifications for membership of the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Are: A. Applicant must show proof of Lineal Descent from original Pechanga Temecula people. B. Adopted people, family or Band, and non-indians cannot be enrolled. Exception: People who were accepted in the Indian Way prior to 1928 will be accepted. C. If you have ever been enrolled or recognized in any other reservation you cannot enroll in Pechanga.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jeffredo v. Macarro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.