Ford v. Pliler’s Empirical Analysis
590 F.3d 782 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brecht v. Abrahamson · Rose v. Lundy · Rhines v. Weber · Pliler Warden v. Ford · Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Rchard Early, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to dismiss his [mixed] petitions without prejudice and then, after exhausting in state court the previously unexhausted claims, to refile in federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sossa v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.