Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 590 So. 2d 1074 - Dimilta v. State

590 So. 2d 1074 - Dimilta v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 558 So. 2d 994 - The Florida Bar v. Bauman · 543 So. 2d 435 - Boffo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find no authority for the proposition that a court may adjudicate or classify a defendant to be a youthful offender on one count but not on the other counts in the same information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.