Routly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State (2000), 769 So. 2d 974 - Asay v. State (2000)
1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he thrust of Giglio and its progeny has been to ensure that the jury know the facts that might motivate a witness in giving testimony, and that the prosecutor not fraudulently conceal such facts from the jury.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the testimony was false; (2) that the prosecutor knew the testimony was false; and (3) that the statement was material.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has a duty to correct testimony he or she knows is false when a witness conceals bias against the defendant through that false testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.