Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 590 So. 2d 431 - Werner v. State

590 So. 2d 431 - Werner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coy v. Iowa · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · Heiney v. Florida · Barrett v. United States · Alford v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as used in section 800.04 (3). Werner contends that the State must prove that the victim saw or sensed the lewd or lascivious act when prosecuting defendants under this statute. The State argues that the plain and ordinary meaning of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the State does not have to prove in any way, fashion or form that the child perceived the act of masturbation. All the State has to prove was [sic] the fact that the defendant masturbated in front of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[k]nowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years without committing the crime of sexual battery is guilty of a felony of the second degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.