Obojes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1995
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 671 - Marquez v. State · 476 So. 2d 165 - State v. Carney · 497 So. 2d 736 - Sharp v. State · 498 So. 2d 1249 - Casteel v. State · 458 So. 2d 13 - Carney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We believe there is little distinction between planning and premeditation and the professional manner in which a crime is committed. As we have stated, the facts relied upon in this case and in many of the district court cases cited above reveal planning on the part of each defendant, not skillfulness. This type of planning is common to most crimes and thus cannot constitute a valid reason for departure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether, in light of that language contained in Hernandez v. State, 575 So.2d 640, 642 (Fla. 1991), concerning premeditation or advance planning, that reason remains a valid reason justifying the imposition of a departure sentence in sexual battery cases?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.