Franklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES A TRIAL COURT COMMIT PER SE REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN, IN RESPONSE TO THE JURORS' REQUEST TO GIVE THEM AN ADDITIONAL PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS PREVIOUSLY FURNISHED THEM, IT GIVES THEM INSTEAD AN ENTIRE SET OF THE WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS, WITHOUT PROVIDING PRIOR NOTICE TO THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEFENSE AND THE STATE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Could we hear or see that portion of the instructions to the jury concerning inferences that may be used to conclude guilt of burglary of a dwelling? There was an element concerning observing an individual in possession of items taken from a dwelling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.