590 So. 2d 496 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Clark v. State · Williams v. State · 237 So. 2d 134 - Sanford v. Rubin · 462 So. 2d 1105 - Dumas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree that (a) the combined effect of the first two of the complained-of arguments were sufficiently improper, and (b) the evidence at trial was otherwise sharply in conflict as to whether a robbery or petit theft was committed by the defendant, that reversible error would have been presented if ... (a) the defendant had properly objected to these two arguments or moved for a mistrial based thereon, and (b) the trial court had overruled the objection or denied the motion for mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.