¶1Appellant challenges special conditions nine through sixteen, eighteen and nineteen of the probationary portion of the sentence he received when he pled guilty to violations of his original probation. The written order of probation imposed the same terms and conditions of his original probationary term, which was revoked in this case. Only one of the special conditions, however, was orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing on the probation revocation. We therefore strike the special conditions referenced above, because the court did not pronounce them at sentencing. See Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The sentence is affirmed in all other respects.
590 So. 2d 549
Mitchell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 20, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-12-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1992
1 state decisions
Relies on Williams v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-12-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →