County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund’s Empirical Analysis
590 U.S. 165 · 2020
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2026
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 2462 · 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1252 · 33 U.S.C. § 1285 · 33 U.S.C. § 1311 · 33 U.S.C. § 1319 · 33 U.S.C. § 1362
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · United States v. Mead Corp. · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.