Bostock v. Clayton County’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
4 district · 38 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1034 · 10 U.S.C. § 654 · 10 U.S.C. § 932 · 11 U.S.C. § 525 · 12 U.S.C. § 1735F · 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823 · 12 U.S.C. § 2277a-10c
Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Furman v. Georgia · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 262 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discriminat[ion] . . . on the basis of sex”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[We] normally interpret[] a statute in accord with the ordinary public meaning of its terms at the time of its enactment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he law makes each instance of discriminating against an individual employee because of that individual's sex an independent violation of Title VII. So . . . an employer who fires both Hannah and Bob for failing to fulfill traditional sex stereotypes doubles rather than eliminates Title VII liability . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.