Haynes v. Kuder’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp. (1992), Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. (2007)
3 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Proceeding 'summarily' means that the court initially determines whether material issues of fact are disputed and, if such factual disputes exist, then conducts an 'expedited evidentiary hearing' to resolve the dispute.” Haynes v. Kuder, 591 A.2d 1286, 1290 (D.C.1991) (citations omitted). Plaintiff is partially correct regarding her assertion that John Thompson Beacon Windows, Ltd. v. Fer-ro, 232 F.2d 366, 367 (D.C.Cir.1956) holds”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen a retainer agreement contains an arbitration clause, `the attorney has the obligation to make a full disclosure to the client of all the ramifications of an agreement to arbitrate, including eliminating the right to sue in court and have a jury trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) On application of a party showing an agreement [to arbitrate], and the opposing party’s refusal to arbitrate, the Court shall order the parties to proceed with arbitration, but if opposing party denies the existence of the agreement to arbitrate the Court shall proceed summarily to the determination of the issue so raised and shall order arbitration if found for the moving party, otherwise, the application shall be denied. (b) On application, the Court may stay an arbitration proceeding commenced or threatened on a showing that there is no agreement to arbitrate. Such an issue, when in substantial and bona fide dispute, shall be forthwith and summarily tried and the stay ordered if found for the moving party. If found for the opposing party, the Court shall order the parties to proceed to arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.