Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 BR 596 - Vu v. Lin (In re Vu)

Vu v. Lin (In re Vu)’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 544

Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Blanchard v. Bergeron · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · University Medical Center v. Sullivan · Aiello v. Providian Financial Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiff's counsel approached her client's pauperism with nobility and did not charge...additional thousands of dollars. I will not follow the courts who require that counsel actually bill their clients without regard to their poverty...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an individual injured by any willful violation of a stay shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorneys' fees, and, in appropriate circumstances, may recover punitive damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Nor does counsel's agreement to represent the debtor pro bono mean that counsel cannot be awarded attorney's fees under fee-shifting statutes such as 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.