Demandre v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
591 F.2d 1088 · 1979
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Hames v. Heckler (1983), Ferguson v. Schweiker (1981)
30 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Laffoon v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(d)(1) The term ‘disability’ means— (A) inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.” 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(1)(A); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1382e(a)(3)(A).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy, regardless of whether such work exists in the immediate area in which he lives, or whether a specific job vacancy exists for him, or whether he would be hired if he applied for work.” 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(2)(A).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The medical evidence generally supports a finding that claimant's condition deteriorated after expiration of his insured status. There is substantial evidence in the record to support ... the Secretary's decision denying plaintiff's claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.