Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 F.2d 953 - New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

591 F.2d 953 · 1979

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 2004
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2004

8 federal appellate ·

1401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lichter v. United States · Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Long Lines Department · 414 F. Supp. 473 - Azzaro v. Harnett · Ebert v. Ebert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “execution and repudiation ... occurred prior to the [January 1, 1975] effective date of ERISA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the grant to the district courts of exclusive jurisdiction over the action for treble damages should be taken to imply an immunity of their decisions from any prejudgment elsewhere; at least on occasions, like those at bar, where the punitive estoppel includes the whole nexus of facts that make up the wrong. The remedy provided is not solely civil; two thirds of the recovery is not remedial and inevitably presupposes a punitive purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “has received a mixed response from legal commentators (citing authorities), and a number of courts have refused to follow it,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.