Perry v. Schwarzenegger’s Empirical Analysis
591 F.3d 1126 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Williams v. Rhodes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“uncertainty about the availability of collateral order review after Mohawk,” court assumed, without deciding, that discovery or ders denying claims of First Amendment privilege”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.