United States v. Palos-Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
591 F.3d 1272 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Sokolow · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in person nature of a tip gives it substantial indicia of reliability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.