Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 F.3d 130 - Ellis v. Solomon

Ellis v. Solomon’s Empirical Analysis

591 F.3d 130 · 2010

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692A (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692G (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Heintz v. Jenkins · Clomon v. Jackson · Russell v. Equifax A.R.S. · Bartlett v. Heibl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the astuteness of a 'Philadelphia lawyer' or even the sophistication of the average, everyday, common consumer,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'conflate lack of sophistication with unreasonableness.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the amount of the debt; (2) the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed; (3) a statement that unless the consumer, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, disputes the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the debt collector; (4) a statement that if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment against the consumer and a copy of such verification or judgment will be mailed to the consumer by the debt collector; and (5) a statement that, upon the consumer’s written request within the thirty-day period, the debt collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.