Moore v. Hosemann’s Empirical Analysis
591 F.3d 741 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Storer v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mootness is 'the doctrine of standing in a time frame.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arce v. La. State“capable of repetition yet evading review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stauffer v. Gearhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.