Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 N.E.2d 1048 - Strong v. State

Strong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. United States · United States v. Gunter · Boyd v. State · Banks v. State · Gossmeyer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless and until the defendants shall, under I.C. 35-41-3-9(b) submit evidence of “conduct more than merely affording a person an opportunity to commit the offense,” the question of entrapment shall not be mentioned in the presence of the jury but is reserved for argument by counsel upon notice and after removal of the jury from the courtroom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Even in the context of undisputed police participation in criminal activity, if evidence of the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime is presented, the defendant is not entitled to an instruction on the entrapment defense unless he presents evidence showing a lack of predisposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.