Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 P2D 969 - Lockwood v. State

Lockwood v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2010

1 district · 14 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Ker v. State of California · Sabbath v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Identification alone ... may constitute substantial compliance “only if the surrounding circumstances made the officers’ purpose clear to the occupants or showed that a demand for admittance would be futile.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 174 Wis. 2d 28 - State v. Berry · Berumen v. State
  2. “police procedures fail to conform to the precise demands of the statute but nevertheless serve its policies”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Berumen v. State · LINDOFF v. State
  3. “Authority of officer executing warrant. In the execution or service of a search warrant, the officer has the same power and authority in all respects to break open any door or window, to use the necessary and proper means to overcome forcible resistance made to the officer, or to call any other person to the officer’s aid as the officer has in the execution or service of a warrant of arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Johnson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.