Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 Pa. 196 - Carrozza v. Greenbaum

Carrozza v. Greenbaum’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Schwartz v. Rockey (2007), Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC. (2009)

36 state decisions

210200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance · Commonwealth v. Miller · 283 Pa. Super. 217 - Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n · Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeSimone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough joint and several liability requires an indivisible injury for which two or more parties are partially responsible, it is the indivisibility of the injury, rather than of culpability, that triggers joint liability”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “statutes are not presumed to make changes in the rules and principles of the common law or prior existing law beyond what is expressly declared in their provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “For judgments in excess of the provider's primary insurance, up to a statutory limit, the MCARE Fund satisfies the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.