¶1The convictions are affirmed. The sentences are vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in compliance with Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991).
¶2Convictions AFFIRMED; Sentences VACATED; REMANDED.
591 So. 2d 1161
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 24, 1992
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-01-24
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1992
1 state decisions
Relies on 586 So. 2d 1058 - Flowers v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-01-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The convictions are affirmed. The sentences are vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in compliance with Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991).
¶2Convictions AFFIRMED; Sentences VACATED; REMANDED.