Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 SO2D 1173 - State v. Blue

State v. Blue’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2015

12 state decisions

80199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson · Anderson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company · 563 So. 2d 449 - State v. King · State v. Creel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n this case, the victim was not physically injured, and no semen or other such physical evidence was recovered. . . . Furthermore, consent was not an issue. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. When an accused is charged with a crime involving sexually assaultive behavior, reputation or opinion evidence of the past sexual behavior of the victim is not admissible. B. When an accused is charged with a crime involving sexually assaultive behavior, evidence of specific instances of the victim's past sexual behavior is also not admissible except for: (1) Evidence of past sexual behavior with persons other than the accused, upon the issue of whether or not the accused was the source of semen or injury; provided that such evidence is limited to a period not to exceed seventy-two hours prior to the time of the offense, and further provided that the jury be instructed at the time and in its final charge regarding the limited purpose for which the evidence is admitted; or (2) Evidence of past sexual behavior with the accused offered by the accused upon the issue of whether or not the victim consented to the sexually assaultive behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.