¶1AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant’s sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
591 So. 2d 270
Hines v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 9, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-10-09
Relies on 392 So. 2d 277 - Moore v. State
Decided 1991-10-09