Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 So. 2d 583 - Humphrey v. State

591 So. 2d 583 - Humphrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Houltin v. United States · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Kimbrough v. United States · Clozza v. Bair · 543 So. 2d 709 - Ex Parte Lynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The tape recorder was allowed in the jury room to aid in evaluating those [drug transaction] recordings. The trial court committed no error in allowing the tape recorder in the jury room.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “' Mann v. State, 581 So.2d 22, 25 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). (Citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he courts in this state have long held that a prospective juror may not be struck for cause based solely on the fact that he is a deputy sheriff or involved in law enforcement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.