Lofton v. Brown & Root’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 575 So. 2d 91 - Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc. · 540 So. 2d 757 - Boyd Bros. Transp., Inc. v. Asmus · Cooper v. Western Supermarkets
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the only evidence concerning Lofton's pain is his own subjective testimony. It is apparent that the trial court did not find this evidence persuasive in light of the other testimony that was presented. A reasonable view of this evidence supports the court's judgment[;] thus it cannot be disturbed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.