Sosa v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2003
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Barker v. Wingo · 585 So. 2d 112 - Ex Parte Bankhead · United States v. Chinchilla · Ex Parte Cofer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[T]he fact that isolated instructions are erroneous or misleading is no ground for reversal where the instructions as a whole present the case properly.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“From reading the jury charges as a whole, we conclude that the trial court made clear to the jury that it was free to accept or reject any part of the testimony given by any witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he record does not indicate that the State attempted to delay the trial in bad faith or for an improper purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.