Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 591 SO2D 897 - Sosa v. State

Sosa v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Barker v. Wingo · 585 So. 2d 112 - Ex Parte Bankhead · United States v. Chinchilla · Ex Parte Cofer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he fact that isolated instructions are erroneous or misleading is no ground for reversal where the instructions as a whole present the case properly.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “From reading the jury charges as a whole, we conclude that the trial court made clear to the jury that it was free to accept or reject any part of the testimony given by any witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he record does not indicate that the State attempted to delay the trial in bad faith or for an improper purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.