Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

591 So. 2d 928

591 So.2d 928

17 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 41

Pierce v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1992

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1992-01-09

Relies on 586 So. 2d 1058 - Flowers v. State · 583 So. 2d 1095 - Swamy v. Hodges

Decided 1992-01-09

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review Pierce v. State, 583 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question of great public importance:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

¶2We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand this case for reconsideration consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

¶3It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
/591/so2d/928 · .json · Public domain