Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 A2D 1036 - In Re Rosenbleet

In Re Rosenbleet’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1344

Relies on United States v. Goldblatt · Matter of Colson · Matter of Bond · Matter of Roberson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice— (1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by. or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “engages in a scheme or systematic course of conduct with intent to defraud or to obtain property of another person by means of a false or fraudulent pretense, representation, or promise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.