Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 1018 - Mustain v. Pearson

Mustain v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 1018 · 1979

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
January 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2015

16 federal appellate ·

15019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 4082 · 18 U.S.C. § 5005 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United State v. Morgan · Carafas v. J · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty. · Costello v. United States · White v. Pearlman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(w)hile the rehabilitative potential under FYCA might be lessened by a consecutively imposed consecutive adult sentence, this consequence stems from the subsequent offense and does not invalidate the subsequent sentence .... Nor could it render legally ineffective the FYCA sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The proper means of attacking the validity of a sentence which has already been served and which is unrelated to the petitioner's present confinement is by writ of error coram nobis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “can be filed only in the court where the alleged errors occurred,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.