Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 1161 - In re Grose

In re Grose’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 1161 · 1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
December 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on In re Sinex · In re Arkley · In re Pearson · In re Mills · In re Hoeksema

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prior art suggests the particular structure or form of the compound or composition as well as suitable methods of obtaining that structure or form”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.