Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 251 - Simons v. United States

Simons v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 251 · 1979

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
January 2000
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2000

13 federal appellate ·

1201979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Di Bella v. United States · United States of America and Rick P. Baken v. Robert A. Glassman · United States v. Peachtree National Distributors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “broadly, holding that only if the motion is 'a collateral attempt to retrieve property and not an effort to suppress evidence in related criminal proceedings is it appealable.' " Simons v. United States, 592 F.2d 251 , 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 835, 100 S.Ct. 69, 62 L.Ed.2d 45 (1979), quoting United States v. Glassman, 533 F.2d 262 (5th Cir.1976). 19 The "related criminal proceedings”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.