United States v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.2d 261 · 1979
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2008
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Escobedo v. Illinois · Gilbert v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The identification was not used in the other proceeding. Only as to that charge had defendant’s right to counsel matured. Since the Government had not ‘committed itself to prosecute’ defendant for this offense at the time of the lineup, his Sixth Amendment claim is without merit. Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 228 , 98 S.Ct. 458 , [464], 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977).””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. State · State v. Ture“It is not the right to counsel that the Fifth Amendment protects but the freedom from custodial interrogation without counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex Parte Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.