Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 546 - Robbins v. Thomas

Robbins v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 546 · 1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
December 2003
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2003

10 federal appellate ·

501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole · Andrino v. United States Board of Parole · Smith v. United States · Robinson v. Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a likelihood that [Valona] will engage in conduct violating any criminal law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the narrow issue of what procedure the United States Parole Commission should follow when events casting doubt on the advisability of terminating parole occur between a parole termination hearing and the issuance of a final decision based on that hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress intended the Parole Commission to use any information it considered relevant in determining whether a parolee is likely to violate the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.