Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 65 - Yaretsky v. Blum

Yaretsky v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 65 · 1979

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2005 · most notably Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. (1982), Blum v. Yaretsky (1982)

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Lemke v. United States · Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service · Feld v. Berger · Dougherty v. Harper's Magazine Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he better rule is that in the absence of prejudice to the appellee, the court should treat a premature appeal as from a final judgment so as to avoid denial of justice, expense, and inconvenience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.