Garoogian v. Medlock’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.2d 997 · 1979
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 1997 · most notably Superior Oil Co. v. Fulmer (1986), Howard R. Dewitt v. Byron L. Brown, M.D. (1982)
21 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff · Hanson v. Ford Motor Co. · A. D. Luster, A's Fishhouses, Inc. v. Retail Credit Company · Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Johnson · Sally A. Gisriel, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas Jerome Gisriel v. Quinn-Moore Oil Corporation, and Uniroyal, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a reviewing court is bound to examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee ... and bound to sustain the jury verdict if there is any substantial evidence to support it.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is the duty of a federal court to apply the rule it believes the state supreme court would follow.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An appellate court may not substitute its view of the facts for that of the trier of fact unless it is in a position to hold that reasonable minds, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, could only have found otherwise than the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.