Bukuras v. Mueller Group, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.3d 255 · 2010
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 18A (Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976)
Relies on Starr v. Fordham · Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co. · Cady v. Marcella · Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Club · Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a reasonable and practical way, consistent with its language, background, and purpose.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be gathered from a fair construction of the contract as a whole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law for the court, as is the initial determination of whether an ambiguity exists.” Bukuras v. Mueller Group, LLC, 592 F.3d 255, 261 (1st Cir.2010). But where the contract”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.