Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.3d 793 - Ray v. Boatwright

Ray v. Boatwright’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.3d 793 · 2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ray was then confronted with numerous statements made by co-actors that they were present [at the] shooting on 29th Street and so was Ray. Ray then stated “those stupid niggers shouldn’t be talking and they can’t talk for me.” When confronted with statements by [Miriam Myles] that Ray was shooting a nine-millimeter on 29th Street [and] in a statement by Sylvester Townsend ... that Ray had a .45-caliber pistol[,] Ray then said “tell me which gun killed the girl and I’ll tell you everything.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prevent[s], even in a joint trial, the admission of a confession by a co-defendant that implicates the other accused”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.