Bergquist v. Mann Bracken, LLP’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.3d 816 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But if the state's court decision causes the federal plaintiff's injury, then review is limited to the state's own appellate judiciary, with the possibility of review by the Supreme Court once the state has made its final decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Federal law does not permit a district judge to remand the complete litigation just because portions belong in state court.”). 6 . Id. (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.