Averianova v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.3d 931 · 2010
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Kamara v. Attorney General · Kaczmarczyk v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider the issues raised and announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camacho v. Whitaker · Ali v. Barr“no duty to write an exegesis on every contention”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a decision is without rational explanation, departs from established policies, invidiously discriminates against a particular race or group, or where the agency fails to consider all factors presented by the alien or distorts important aspects of the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camacho v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.