Gordon v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2010
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Erickson v. Pardus · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) the institutional record including program goals and accomplishments, academic achievements, vocational education, training or work assignments, therapy and interpersonal relationships with staff and inmates; (ii) performance, if any, as a participant in a temporary release program; (iii) release plans in-eluding community resources, employment, education and training and support services available to the inmate; (iv) any deportation order issued by the federal government against the inmate ...; and (v) any statement made to the board by the crime victim or the victim’s representative .... 37”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Lemons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.